See the team srt post.
http://www.caliberforums.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4155&postcount=126
Are they saying the computer limits how much torque is available to save the tranny etc.? Is this why its rated at 260 ft lbs and not higher like the HP?
Wouldnt suprise me as massive ecm torque control programs are on the Hemi Ram, Charger, and 300. Those all limit the torque at shift points which is why most owners complain about the soft granny shifts. Since the caliber is a manual they can't limit it that way but they could limit max boost to keep torque below a set amount.
I dont see this as good news at all.
http://www.caliberforums.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4155&postcount=126
Are they saying the computer limits how much torque is available to save the tranny etc.? Is this why its rated at 260 ft lbs and not higher like the HP?
Wouldnt suprise me as massive ecm torque control programs are on the Hemi Ram, Charger, and 300. Those all limit the torque at shift points which is why most owners complain about the soft granny shifts. Since the caliber is a manual they can't limit it that way but they could limit max boost to keep torque below a set amount.
I dont see this as good news at all.
